Thursday, February 16, 2017
Right decision, but belated
Tamil Nadu Governor has taken right decision by inviting Sasikala
loyalist Edapadi Palaniswamy to form govt. He is going to be sworn-in
as CM of Tamil Nadu this evening i.e. on Thursday 4.30 PM. Though the
decision of the Governor is belated, it appears that when he became
convinced about the number on the basis of the signature by 123 AIADMK
MLAs support to Sasikala's nominee E Palaniswami's candidature for the
leader of the legislative assembly, he invited him to be sworn-in as
CM. Governor has given him 15 days' time to prove his majority on the
floor of the assembly. He appears to gone by the number, which is also
the right criterion for invitation to the legislative party leader to
form the govt. OPS may have claimed that he has overwhelming support
of the people of the state and he represents Amma in AIADMK politics
in the true sense of the term, but as far as number of supporting MLAs
is concerned, he is far behind the majority support. He had reportedly
submitted the signature of only 10 MLAs to the Governor. But he claims
that if the party MLAs kept in the protective custody in Golden Resort
by Sasikala, before being sent to jail by the Supreme Court in
Disproportionate Assets case freed, they would flock to his camp. If
his claim holds water, he can show it on the day of vote confidence to
be sought by Paliniswamy in the assembly within 15 days.
Paliniswamy has been one the most trusted lieutenants of J
Jayalaliththa and he is also Sasikala’s loyalist. When AIADMK General
Secretary Sasikala was held guilty in Disproportionate Assets case and
awarded four years of jail by the Supreme Court, her hope to become
the CM was dashed to the ground. Before going to jail, she appointed
Paliniswamy as the leader of legislative party and Diwakaran her
nephew as the Deputy General Secretary of the party. She had already
expelled OPS from the party.It clearly means she intends to rule the
state and the party from the jail through her proxies.
The formula of rule by proxy is not new in the politics of the
nation. It was for the first time when Bihar Chief Minister Lalu
Prasad Yadav was sent to jail in Fodder scam case, he had brought his
wife Rabri Devi straight from the kitchen and put her on the chair of
Chief Minister. First he got her elected as the leader of the
legislative party, then she staked claim before the governor to be
sworn-in as CM. Lalu went to jail and she became the Chief Minister of
Bihar. He ruled the state from jail through none other than his wife
Rabri Devi as proxy. So, it appears that Sasikala has played the same
game.
But there is also a wide difference between the political scenario of
Bihar and Tamil Nadu. Former Bihar Chief Minister and RJD supremo has
always been one of the most popular leaders of the country. He is a
mass leader while Sasikala's political identity is only that she has
been a close aide of Jayalalithaa. She is not a leader of the people
in Tamil Nadu. She claims to be the most suitable person to carry
forward the legacy of Amma only because she lived with Jaya in Poes
Garden residence and was treated as her sister. That is right. But as
far political succession is concerned, it can only be decided by the
people of Tamil Nadu.
Paliniswamy may win the vote of confidence in the assembly, but the
real test will be in the assembly elections. As far the claim of O
Panerselvam on the legacy of Jayalaliththa is concerned, he has been
one of her most trusted political lieutenants. Whenever she had to
vacate the chair of CM either because of adverse court judgement or
ill-health, she nominated OPS to rule the state in her absence. He has
carried out the responsibility twice. OPS himself is a leader of the
people in his own right. Sasikala nominee Paliniswamy may win the vote
of confidence, but the battle for inheriting Jaya's legacy will go on
until the assembly elections are held.
The command of the government will only be established by a fresh
mandate. In the assembly of 234 members in Tamil Nadu, Jaya's AIADMK
had 134. So, at least 117 MLAs are required to show majority in the
assembly. Otherwise, state will be put under President's Rule.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment